• 中国出版政府奖提名奖

    中国百强科技报刊

    湖北出版政府奖

    中国高校百佳科技期刊

    中国最美期刊

    留言板

    尊敬的读者、作者、审稿人, 关于本刊的投稿、审稿、编辑和出版的任何问题, 您可以本页添加留言。我们将尽快给您答复。谢谢您的支持!

    姓名
    邮箱
    手机号码
    标题
    留言内容
    验证码

    湘中涟源凹陷石炭系测水组页岩气成藏特征及勘探潜力

    田巍 彭中勤 白云山 王保忠 王强 苗凤彬 刘飞宇

    田巍, 彭中勤, 白云山, 王保忠, 王强, 苗凤彬, 刘飞宇, 2019. 湘中涟源凹陷石炭系测水组页岩气成藏特征及勘探潜力. 地球科学, 44(3): 939-952. doi: 10.3799/dqkx.2018.291
    引用本文: 田巍, 彭中勤, 白云山, 王保忠, 王强, 苗凤彬, 刘飞宇, 2019. 湘中涟源凹陷石炭系测水组页岩气成藏特征及勘探潜力. 地球科学, 44(3): 939-952. doi: 10.3799/dqkx.2018.291
    Tian Wei, Peng Zhongqin, Bai Yunshan, Wang Baozhong, Wang Qiang, Miao Fengbin, Liu Feiyu, 2019. Reservoir Characteristics and Exploration Potential of Lower Carboniferous Shale Gas in Lianyuan Sag, Central Hunan. Earth Science, 44(3): 939-952. doi: 10.3799/dqkx.2018.291
    Citation: Tian Wei, Peng Zhongqin, Bai Yunshan, Wang Baozhong, Wang Qiang, Miao Fengbin, Liu Feiyu, 2019. Reservoir Characteristics and Exploration Potential of Lower Carboniferous Shale Gas in Lianyuan Sag, Central Hunan. Earth Science, 44(3): 939-952. doi: 10.3799/dqkx.2018.291

    湘中涟源凹陷石炭系测水组页岩气成藏特征及勘探潜力

    doi: 10.3799/dqkx.2018.291
    基金项目: 

    中国地质调查局项目 DD20160179

    详细信息
      作者简介:

      田巍(1986-), 男, 工程师, 博士, 主要从事含油气盆地构造分析及页岩气地质调查

      通讯作者:

      彭中勤

    • 中图分类号: P618.13

    Reservoir Characteristics and Exploration Potential of Lower Carboniferous Shale Gas in Lianyuan Sag, Central Hunan

    • 摘要: 目前对海陆过渡相页岩的储层及其成藏特征研究较少.湘中地区涟源凹陷下石炭统测水组海陆过渡相页岩是重要的页岩气勘探层位,基于二维地震资料、钻井岩心资料和测录井资料,选取2015H-D6井进行了井区构造与测水组岩性描述,页岩储层地化、物性及含气量等测试分析,以及单井埋藏史和热史模拟.研究表明:涟源凹陷海陆过渡相测水组泥页岩沉积于滨岸泻湖或沼泽环境,有效厚度为71.8 m,埋深大于2 500 m;泥页岩有机碳含量平均为1.68%,干酪根类型以Ⅱ型为主,具备良好的生气基础和吸附载体;成熟度分布在2.30%~3.32%,平均为2.96%,处于过成熟阶段;储层脆性矿物含量超过60%,粘土矿物含量小于30%,储层整体表现为低孔低渗特性,孔隙以微孔隙为主,具较好的页岩气储层条件.利用测井解释、等温吸附以及现场解析等方法,揭示出测水组泥页岩具有较好的含气量,结合模拟结果提出了构造保存并持续沉降是涟源凹陷海陆过渡相测水组页岩气藏形成的关键因素.

       

    • 图  1  涟源凹陷构造单元划分

      Fig.  1.  Subdivision of tectonic units in Lianyuan Sag

      图  2  过车田江向斜地震剖面

      剖面位置见图 1.资料来源于中国地质调查局油气资源调查中心,2014.湘中地区页岩气调查二维地震勘探成果报告

      Fig.  2.  The seismic section cross the Chetianjiang syncline

      图  3  2015H-D6井综合柱状图

      Fig.  3.  Integrated histogram of Well 2015H-D6

      图  4  2015H-D6井测水组泥页岩TOC分布直方图

      Fig.  4.  The TOC distribution histogram of the mud shale of Ceshui Formation in Well 2015H-D6

      图  5  2015H-D6井测水组泥页岩矿物成分含量对比

      Fig.  5.  The contrast for mineral composition contents of Ceshui Formation shale in Well 2015H-D6

      图  6  2015H-D6井测水组泥页岩孔隙类型

      a.有机质与矿物之间微裂隙;b.有机质孔隙;c.黄铁矿晶间孔;d.矿物溶蚀孔隙;e.同沉积收缩缝;f.微裂缝

      Fig.  6.  Pore types of Ceshui Formation shale in Well 2015H-D6

      图  7  测水组页岩气层测井解释成果

      Fig.  7.  Logging interpretation results of Ceshui Formation shale gas

      图  8  2015H-D6井测水组页岩、煤以及川东南地区龙马溪组页岩等温吸附曲线对比

      Fig.  8.  The comparison of isothermal adsorption curves among shale and coal of Ceshui Formation in Well 2015H-D6 and Longmaxi Formation shale in southeastern Sichuan Basin

      图  9  2015H-D6井测水组页岩气解析气量分布

      Fig.  9.  Analytical gas distribution of Ceshui Formation shale gas in Well 2015H-D6

      图  10  2015H-D6井单井热史、埋藏史模拟

      Fig.  10.  Single well simulation of the thermal and burial history for Well 2015H-D6

      图  11  梓门桥组膏岩层测井及岩心特征

      Fig.  11.  Logging and core characteristics of gypsolyte of Zimenqiao Formation

      图  12  湘中涟源凹陷测水组埋深图及有利区分布

      张琳婷等(2014)修改

      Fig.  12.  Buried depth map and favorable area distribution of Ceshui Formation in Lianyuan Sag

      表  1  中国主要海陆过渡相页岩气储层参数对比

      Table  1.   Comparison of major transitional facies shale gas reservoir parameters in China

      储层参数 层位 总有机碳
      TOC(%)
      成熟度
      Ro(%)
      有机质
      类型
      平均孔隙度
      (%)
      基质渗透率
      (μm2)
      脆性矿物
      含量(%)
      含气量
      (m3/t)
      沁水盆地 太原组 2.5 1.7~3.6 2 1.66 0.9 32.1~45.2 1.23
      山西组 3.11 1.0~2.35 2 4.15 1.1 68 1
      鄂尔多斯盆地 本溪组 2.7 1.52 Ⅲ/Ⅱ2 3.89 180 30.6 0.98
      山西组 2.30 1.3~2.68 Ⅲ型 3.44 2.5 43.7 0.38
      四川盆地南部 龙潭组 6.73 1.95~2.4 Ⅲ型 6.3 27.7 1.0~3.0
      湘中及湘东南 大隆组 2.7 1.16~2.6 2 0.68 6.5 79.8 3.45
      龙潭组 4.48 2.2~3.5 1 1.42 5.4 29~86 2.74
      涟源凹陷 测水组 1.68 2.3~3.3 2 3.53 50.7 69.13 2.29
      下载: 导出CSV

      表  2  2015H-D6井测水组泥页岩样品热解分析结果

      Table  2.   Pyrolysis analysis results of Ceshui Formation shale samples in Well 2015H-D6

      取样深度(m) S1(mg·g-1) S2(mg·g-1) Tmax(℃)
      1 183.3 0.04 0.09 497
      1 215.0 0.08 0.28 496
      1 238.3 0.04 0.11 533
      1 303.5 0.05 0.10 534
      1 308.4 0.03 0.08 534
      1 316.9 0.03 0.03 428
      下载: 导出CSV

      表  3  2015H-D6井测水组泥页岩粘土矿物组成

      Table  3.   Statistics on clay mineral compositions of Ceshui Formation shale in Well 2015H-D6

      粘土矿物 相对含量(%)
      最小值 最大值 平均值
      S / / /
      I 24 71 43.5
      K 6 45 21.9
      C 6 31 11.8
      I/S 5 20 16.0
      C/S / / /
      下载: 导出CSV

      表  4  页岩气储层类别划分

      Table  4.   Classification for shale gas reservoir

      类别 评价参数
      孔隙度(%) 渗透率(10-3μm2) TOC(%) 含气量(m3/t)
      Ⅰ类 Φ≥10 100≤K<500 TOC≥4.0 Q≥4
      Ⅱ类 5≤Φ<10 10≤K<100 2.0≤TOC<4.0 2≤Q<4
      Ⅲ类 2≤Φ<5 1≤K<10 1.0≤TOC<2.0 1≤Q<2
      Ⅳ类 Φ<2 K<1 TOC<1.0 0≤Q<1
      下载: 导出CSV

      表  5  2015H-D6井页岩气储层测井成果解释

      Table  5.   Logging result interpretation for shale gas reservoir in Well 2015H-D6

      层号 顶部
      埋深
      (m)
      底部
      埋深
      (m)
      岩层
      厚度
      (m)
      孔隙度(%) TOC(%) 游离气
      (m3/t)
      吸附气
      (m3/t)
      总含气量(m3/t)
      $\frac{{最小值 - 最大值}}{{平均值}} $ $ \frac{{最小值 - 最大值}}{{平均值}} $ $ \frac{{最小值 - 最大值}}{{平均值}} $
      1 268.90 1 270.90 2.00 $\frac{{5.59 \sim 13.99}}{{9.16}} $ $\frac{{2.41 \sim 33.17}}{{9.40}} $ 0.80 2.06 $\frac{{0.68 \sim 8.92}}{{2.86}} $
      1 296.60 1 313.00 16.40 $\frac{{8.53 \sim 11.34}}{{10.35}} $ $ \frac{{2.45 \sim 5.35}}{{4.07}}$ 0.29 0.97 $ \frac{{0.73 \sim 1.68}}{{1.27}}$
      1 314.95 1 318.60 3.65 $\frac{{8.53 \sim 11.98}}{{10.52}} $ $ \frac{{2.45 \sim 6.55}}{{4.62}}$ 0.29 1.08 $ \frac{{0.77 \sim 1.83}}{{1.37}}$
      1 326.50 1 328.20 1.70 $\frac{{8.53 \sim 13.17}}{{10.88}} $ $ \frac{{2.91 \sim 5.76}}{{4.41}}$ 0.23 1.04 $\frac{{0.77 \sim 1.98}}{{1.28}} $
      1 329.50 1 340.70 11.20 $ \frac{{3.13 \sim 11.81}}{{10.84}}$ $ \frac{{2.58 \sim 5.35}}{{4.31}}$ 0.34 1.02 $\frac{{0.88 \sim 1.68}}{{1.36}}$
      下载: 导出CSV

      表  6  涟源凹陷测水组有利区页岩气资源评价参数值

      Table  6.   Evaluation parameters of shale gas resources in favorable area of Ceshui Formation in Lianyuan Sag

      参数 P5 P25 P50 P75 P95
      体积参数 面积(km2) 262.40
      有效厚度(m) 35.63 34.72 32.31 25.75 22.52
      含气量参数 总含气量(m3/t) 2.46 2.29 2.29 0.33 0.33
      其他参数 TOC(%) 1.15~1.70
      页岩密度(g/cm3) 2.60
      地质资源量(108 m3) 752.46 559.73 398.48 87.72 55.69
      下载: 导出CSV
    • Bao, S.J., Lin, T., Nie, H.K., et al., 2016.Preliminary Study of the Transitional Facies Shale Gas Reservoir Characteristics:Taking Permian in the Xiangzhong Depression as an Example.Earth Science Frontiers, 23(1):44-53(in Chinese with English abstract). http://d.old.wanfangdata.com.cn/Periodical/dxqy201601004
      Bernard, S., Horsfield, B., Schulz, H.M., et al., 2012.Geochemical Evolution of Organic-Rich Shales with Increasing Maturity:A STXM and TEM Study of the Posidonia Shale (Lower Toarcian, Northern Germany).Marine and Petroleum Geology, 31(1):70-89. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.marpetgeo.2011.05.010
      Bowker, K.A., 2007.Barnett Shale Gas Production, Fort Worth Basin:Issues and Discussion.AAPG Bulletin, 91(4):523-533. https://doi.org/10.1306/06190606018
      Ge, M.N., Zhang, J.C., Li, X.G., et al., 2012.Gas-Bearing Property Analysis on Upper Paleozoic Shale in Eastern Uplift of Liaohe Basin.Fault-Block Oil & Gas Field, 19(6):722-726(in Chinese with English abstract). http://www.wanfangdata.com.cn/details/detail.do?_type=perio&id=dkyqt201206010
      Guo, S.B., Wang, Y.G., 2013.Shale Gas Accumulation Conditions and Exploration Potential of Carboniferous Benxi Formation in Ordos Basin.Acta Petrolei Sinica, 34(3):445-452(in Chinese with English abstract). http://www.wanfangdata.com.cn/details/detail.do?_type=perio&id=syxb201303004
      Guo, T.L., Liu, R.B., 2013.Implications from Marine Shale Gas Exploration Breakthrough in Complicated Structural Area at High Thermal Stage:Taking Longmaxi Formation in Well JY1 as an Example.Natural Gas Geoscience, 24(4):643-651(in Chinese with English abstract). http://d.old.wanfangdata.com.cn/Periodical/trqdqkx201304001
      Guo, W., Xiong, W., Gao, S.S., et al., 2013.Impact of Temperature on the Isothermal Adsorption/Desorption Characteristics of Shale Gas.Petroleum Exploration and Development, 40(4):481-485(in Chinese with English abstract). doi: 10.1016/S1876-3804(13)60061-0
      Gu, Z.X., Peng, Y.M., He, Y.B., et al., 2015.Geological Conditions of Permian Sea-Land Transitional Facies Shale Gas in the Xiangzhong Depression.Geology in China, 42(1):288-299(in Chinese with English abstract). http://www.wanfangdata.com.cn/details/detail.do?_type=perio&id=zgdizhi2015010023
      Jia, J.J., 2016.Study on the Marine-Continental Transitional Shale Gas Accumulation Conditions in the Upper Paleozoic Qinshui Basin.West-China Exploration Engineering, 28(2):47-50 (in Chinese).
      Jiang, Y.Q., Dong, D.Z., Qi, L., et al., 2010.Basic Features and Evaluation of Shale Gas Reservoirs.Natural Gas Industry, 30(10):7-12 (in Chinese with English abstract). http://www.wanfangdata.com.cn/details/detail.do?_type=perio&id=trqgy201010002
      Ju, Y.W., Qi, Y., Fang, L.Z., et al., 2016.Chinese Shale Gas Reservoir Types and Their Controlling Factors.Advances in Earth Science, 31(8):782-799 (in Chinese with English abstract).
      Li, G.L, Wang, X.H., Bo, D.Y., et al., 2015.Potentiality Exploration of the Upper Permian Longtan Formation Shale Gas in Central and Southeastern Hunan Province.Geological Science and Technology Information, 34(3):133-138 (in Chinese with English abstract).
      Li, Y.X., Nie, H.K., Long, P.Y., 2009.Development Characteristics of Organic-Rich Shale and Strategic Selection of Shale Gas Exploration Area in China.Natural Gas Industry, 29(12):115-118 (in Chinese with English abstract). http://www.wanfangdata.com.cn/details/detail.do?_type=perio&id=trqgy200912034
      Liang, X., Ye, X., Zhang, J.H., et al., 2011.Evaluation of Preservation Conditions of Lower Paleozoic Marine Shale Gas Reservoirs in the Northern Part of Dianqianbei Depression.Marine Origin Petroleum Geology, 16(4):11-21 (in Chinese with English abstract). http://www.wanfangdata.com.cn/details/detail.do?_type=perio&id=hxyqdz201104002
      Lin, J.F., Hu, H.Y., Li, Q., 2017.Geochemical Characteristics and Implications of Shale Gas in Jiaoshiba, Eastern Sichuan, China.Earth Science, 42(7):1124-1133 (in Chinese with English abstract). https://doi.org/10.3799/dqkx.2017.091
      Liu, J.N., Zhu, Y.M., Liu, Y., et al., 2015.Characteristics of the Mud Shale Reservoirs of Transitional Facies:With Qinshui Basin as an Example.Coal Geology & Exploration, 43(6):23-28 (in Chinese with English abstract).
      Luo, X.P., Li, Y.F., Wu, C.R., et al., 2013.Characteristics of Mud Shale Reservoirs in Upper Permian Longtan Formation of Southeast Hunan Depression, China.Journal of Chengdu University of Technology(Science & Technology Edition), 40(5):588-594 (in Chinese with English abstract). http://www.wanfangdata.com.cn/details/detail.do?_type=perio&id=cdlgxyxb201305011
      Martineau, D.F., 2007.History of the Newark East Field and the Barnett Shale as a Gas Reservoir.AAPG Bulletin, 91(4):399-403. https://doi.org/10.1306/intro910407
      Miao, F.B., Tan, H., Wang, Q., et al., 2016.Preservation Conditions in Shale Gas of Carboniferous Ceshui Formation of Lianyuan Depression in the Middle of Hunan Province.Geological Science and Technology Information, 35(6):90-97(in Chinese with English abstract). http://www.wanfangdata.com.cn/details/detail.do?_type=perio&id=dzkjqb201606013
      Misch, D., Gross, D., Mahlstedt, N., et al., 2016.Shale Gas/Shale Oil Potential of Upper Visean Black Shales in the Dniepr-Donets Basin (Ukraine).Marine and Petroleum Geology, 75(4):203-219. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.marpetgeo.2016.04.017
      Nie, H.K., Zhang, J.C., 2011.Types and Characteristics of Shale Gas Reservoir:A Case Study of Lower Paleozoic in and around Sichuan Basin.Petroleum Geology & Experiment, 33(3):219-225, 232(in Chinese with English abstract).
      Pu, B.L., Jiang, Y.L., Wang, Y., et al., 2010.Reservoir-Forming Conditions and Favorable Exploration Zones of Shale Gas in Lower Silurian Longmaxi Formation of Sichuan Basin.Acta Petrolei Sinica, 31(2):225-230 (in Chinese with English abstract). http://www.wanfangdata.com.cn/details/detail.do?_type=perio&id=syxb201002008
      Ross, D.J.K., Bustin, R.M., 2009.The Importance of Shale Composition and Pore Structure upon Gas Storage Potential of Shale Gas Reservoirs.Marine and Petroleum Geology, 26(6):916-927. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.marpetgeo.2008.06.004
      Sun, Z.P., Wang, Y.L., Wei, Z.F., et al., 2017.Shale Gas Content and Geochemical Characteristics of Marine-Continental Transitional Shale:A Case from the Shanxi Formation of Ordos Basin.Journal of China University of Mining & Technology, 46(4):859-868 (in Chinese with English abstract). http://d.old.wanfangdata.com.cn/Periodical/zgkydxxb201704020
      Wang, L.P., 2012.Shale Gas Exploration Prospect of Shanxi Formation in Qinshui Basin.Petrochemical Industry Application, 31(12):1-3, 14(in Chinese with English abstract). http://www.wanfangdata.com.cn/details/detail.do?_type=perio&id=syhgyy201212001
      Wang, Q., Chen, X., Jha, A.N., et al., 2014.Natural Gas from Shale Formation-The Evolution, Evidences and Challenges of Shale Gas Revolution in United States.Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 30:1-28. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2013.08.065
      Wang, S.J., Li, D.H., Li, J.Z., et al., 2011.Exploration Potential of Shale Gas in the Ordos Basin.Natural Gas Industry, 31(12):40-46 (in Chinese with English abstract).
      Wang, X.Z., Zhang, J.C., Cao, J.Z., et al., 2012.A Preliminary Discussion on Evaluation of Continental Shale Gas Resources:A Case Study of Chang 7 of Mesozoic Yanchang Formation in Zhiluo-Xiasiwan Area of Yanchang.Earth Science Frontiers, 19(2):192-197 (in Chinese with English abstract). http://d.old.wanfangdata.com.cn/Periodical/dxqy201202029
      Wu, L.M., Ding, W.L., Zhang, J.C., et al., 2011.Fracture Prediction of Organic-Enriched Shale Reservoir in Lower Silurian Longmaxi Formation of Southeastern Chongqing Area.Journal of Oil and Gas Technology, 33(9):43-46 (in Chinese with English abstract).
      Xiang, C.F., Feng, Z.Q., Pang, X.Q., et al., 2007.Late Stage Thermal History of the Songliao Basin and Its Tectonic Implications:Evidence from Apatite Fission Track (AFT) Analyses.Scientia Sinica Terrae, 37(8):1024-1031 (in Chinese).
      Yan, D.Y., Huang, W.H., Zhang, J.C., 2015.Characteristics of Marine-Continental Transitional Organic-Rich Shale in the Ordos Basin and Its Shale Gas Significance.Earth Science Frontiers, 22(6):197-206 (in Chinese with English abstract). http://d.old.wanfangdata.com.cn/Periodical/dxqy201506015
      Zhai, G.Y., Wang, Y.F., Bao, S.J., et al., 2017.Major Factors Controlling the Accumulation and High Productivity of Marine Shale Gas and Prospect Forecast in Southern China.Earth Science, 42(7):1057-1068 (in Chinese with English abstract). https://doi.org/10.3799/dqkx.2017.085
      Zhang, J.C., Nie, H.K., Xu, B., et al., 2008.Geological Condition of Shale Gas Accumulation in Sichuan Basin.Nature Gas Industry, 28(2):151-156 (in Chinese with English abstract). http://d.old.wanfangdata.com.cn/Periodical/zgdzdc201804003
      Zhang, J.Z., Li, X.Q., Wang, Y., et al., 2015.Accumulation Conditions and Reservoir Characteristics of Marine-Terrigenous Facies Coal Measures Shale Gas from Longtan Formation in South Sichuan Basin.Journal of China Coal Society, 40(8):1871-1878 (in Chinese with English abstract). http://d.old.wanfangdata.com.cn/Periodical/mtxb201508022
      Zhang, L.H., Tang, H.M., Chen, G., et al., 2014.Adsorption Capacity and Controlling Factors of the Lower Silurian Longmaxi Shale Play in Southern Sichuan Basin.Natural Gas Industry, 34(12):63-69(in Chinese with English abstract). http://www.wanfangdata.com.cn/details/detail.do?_type=perio&id=trqgy201412008
      Zhang, L.T., Guo, J.H., Jiao, P., et al., 2014.Accumulation Conditions and Exploration Potential of Shale Gas of Lower Carboniferous in Lianyuan Depression in the Middle of Hunan Province.Journal of Central South University (Science and Technology), 45(7):2268-2277 (in Chinese with English abstract).
      Zhang, L.X., Jiang, C.F., Guo, C., 2012.Exploration Potential of Upper Paleozoic Shale Gas in the Eastern Ordos Basin.Journal of Xi'an Shiyou University (Natural Science Edition), 27(1):23-26, 34 (in Chinese with English abstract).
      Zhu, R., Guo, J.H., Kuang, L.X., 2009.Vitrinite Reflectance and Resume of the Strata Degradation Thickness in Lianyuan Depression in the Middle of Hunan Province.Geological Survey and Research, 32(1):22-26 (in Chinese with English abstract).
      Zou, C.N., Dong, D.Z., Wang, S.J., et al., 2010.Geological Characteristics, Formation Mechanism and Resource Potential of Shale Gas in China.Petroleum Exploration and Development, 37(6):641-653 (in Chinese with English abstract). doi: 10.1016/S1876-3804(11)60001-3
      包书景, 林拓, 聂海宽, 等, 2016.海陆过渡相页岩气成藏特征初探:以湘中坳陷二叠系为例.地学前缘, 23(1):44-53. http://d.old.wanfangdata.com.cn/Periodical/dxqy201601004
      葛明娜, 张金川, 李晓光, 等, 2012.辽河东部凸起上古生界页岩含气性分析.断块油气田, 19(6):722-726. http://d.old.wanfangdata.com.cn/Periodical/dkyqt201206010
      郭少斌, 王义刚, 2013.鄂尔多斯盆地石炭系本溪组页岩气成藏条件及勘探潜力.石油学报, 34(3):445-452. http://d.old.wanfangdata.com.cn/Periodical/syxb201303004
      郭彤楼, 刘若冰, 2013.复杂构造区高演化程度海相页岩气勘探突破的启示——以四川盆地东部盆缘JY1井为例.天然气地球科学, 24(4):643-651. http://www.wanfangdata.com.cn/details/detail.do?_type=perio&id=trqdqkx201304001
      郭为, 熊伟, 高树生, 等, 2013.温度对页岩等温吸附/解吸特征影响.石油勘探与开发, 40(4):481-485. http://www.wanfangdata.com.cn/details/detail.do?_type=perio&id=syktykf201304014
      顾志翔, 彭勇民, 何幼斌, 等, 2015.湘中坳陷二叠系海陆过渡相页岩气地质条件.中国地质, 42(1):288-299. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-3657.2015.01.023
      贾俊杰, 2016.沁水盆地上古生界海陆过渡相页岩气成藏条件研究.西部探矿工程, 28(2):47-50. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1004-5716.2016.02.016
      蒋裕强, 董大忠, 漆麟, 等, 2010.页岩气储层的基本特征及其评价.天然气工业, 30(10):7-12. http://d.old.wanfangdata.com.cn/Periodical/trqgy201010002
      琚宜文, 戚宇, 房立志, 等, 2016.中国页岩气的储层类型及其制约因素.地球科学进展, 31(8):782-799. http://d.old.wanfangdata.com.cn/Periodical/hgbzjlzl201711048
      李国亮, 王先辉, 柏道远, 等, 2015.湘中及湘东南地区上二叠统龙潭组页岩气勘探前景.地质科技情报, 34(3):133-138. http://www.wanfangdata.com.cn/details/detail.do?_type=perio&id=dzkjqb201503018
      李玉喜, 聂海宽, 龙鹏宇, 2009.我国富含有机质泥页岩发育特点与页岩气战略选区.天然气工业, 29(12):115-118. doi: 10.3787/j.issn.1000-0976.2009.12.034
      梁兴, 叶熙, 张介辉, 等, 2011.滇黔北下古生界海相页岩气藏赋存条件评价.海相油气地质, 16(4):11-21. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1672-9854.2011.04.002
      林俊峰, 胡海燕, 黎祺, 2017.川东焦石坝地区页岩气特征及其意义.地球科学, 42(7):1124-1133. https://doi.org/10.3799/dqkx.2017.091
      刘娇男, 朱炎铭, 刘宇, 等, 2015.海陆过渡相泥页岩储层特征研究——以沁水盆地为例.煤田地质与勘探, 43(6):23-28. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1001-1986.2015.06.004
      罗小平, 李奕霏, 吴昌荣, 等, 2013.湘东南拗陷龙潭组泥页岩储层特征.成都理工大学学报(自然科学版), 40(5):588-594. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1671-9727.2013.05.11
      苗凤彬, 谭慧, 王强, 等, 2016.湘中涟源凹陷石炭系测水组页岩气保存条件.地质科技情报, 35(6):90-97. http://www.wanfangdata.com.cn/details/detail.do?_type=perio&id=dzkjqb201606013
      聂海宽, 张金川, 2011.页岩气储层类型和特征研究——以四川盆地及其周缘下古生界为例.石油实验地质, 33(3):219-225, 232. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1001-6112.2011.03.001
      蒲泊伶, 蒋有录, 王毅, 等, 2010.四川盆地下志留统龙马溪组页岩气成藏条件及有利地区分析.石油学报, 31(2):225-230. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1001-8719.2010.02.011
      孙则朋, 王永莉, 魏志福, 等, 2017.海陆过渡相页岩含气性及气体地球化学特征——以鄂尔多斯盆地山西组页岩为例.中国矿业大学学报, 46(4):859-868. http://www.wanfangdata.com.cn/details/detail.do?_type=perio&id=zgkydxxb201704020
      王莉萍, 2012.沁水盆地山西组页岩气勘探前景.石油化工应用, 31(12):1-3, 14. http://d.old.wanfangdata.com.cn/Periodical/syhgyy201212001
      王社教, 李登华, 李建忠, 等, 2011.鄂尔多斯盆地页岩气勘探潜力分析.天然气工业, 31(12):40-46. doi: 10.3787/j.issn.1000-0976.2011.12.006
      王香增, 张金川, 曹金舟, 等, 2012.陆相页岩气资源评价初探:以延长直罗-下寺湾区中生界长7段为例.地学前缘, 19(2):192-197. http://d.old.wanfangdata.com.cn/Periodical/dxqy201202029
      吴礼明, 丁文龙, 张金川, 等, 2011.渝东南地区下志留统龙马溪组富有机质页岩储层裂缝分布预测.石油天然气学报, 33(9):43-46. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-9752.2011.09.009
      向才富, 冯志强, 庞雄奇, 等, 2007.松辽盆地晚期热历史及其构造意义:磷灰石裂变径迹(AFT)证据.中国科学(D辑), 37(8):1024-1031. http://d.old.wanfangdata.com.cn/Periodical/zgkx-cd200708005
      闫德宇, 黄文辉, 张金川, 2015.鄂尔多斯盆地海陆过渡相富有机质泥页岩特征及页岩气意义.地学前缘, 22(6):197-206. http://d.old.wanfangdata.com.cn/Periodical/dxqy201506015
      翟刚毅, 王玉芳, 包书景, 等, 2017.我国南方海相页岩气富集高产主控因素及前景预测.地球科学, 42(7):1057-1068. https://doi.org/10.3799/dqkx.2017.085
      张吉振, 李贤庆, 王元, 等, 2015.海陆过渡相煤系页岩气成藏条件及储层特征——以四川盆地南部龙潭组为例.煤炭学报, 40(8):1871-1878. http://www.wanfangdata.com.cn/details/detail.do?_type=perio&id=mtxb201508022
      张金川, 聂海宽, 徐波, 等, 2008.四川盆地页岩气成藏地质条件.天然气工业, 28(2):151-156. doi: 10.3787/j.issn.1000-0976.2008.02.045
      张丽霞, 姜呈馥, 郭超, 2012.鄂尔多斯盆地东部上古生界页岩气勘探潜力分析.西安石油大学学报(自然科学版), 27(1):23-26, 34. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1673-064X.2012.01.005
      张烈辉, 唐洪明, 陈果, 等, 2014.川南下志留统龙马溪组页岩吸附特征及控制因素.天然气工业, 34(12):63-69. doi: 10.3787/j.issn.1000-0976.2014.12.008
      张琳婷, 郭建华, 焦鹏, 等, 2014.湘中地区涟源凹陷下石炭统页岩气藏形成条件.中南大学学报(自然科学版), 45(7):2268-2277. http://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-ZNGD201407019.htm
      朱锐, 郭建华, 旷理雄, 2009.湘中涟源凹陷镜质体反射率与地层剥蚀厚度恢复.地质调查与研究, 32(1):22-26. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1672-4135.2009.01.004
      邹才能, 董大忠, 王社教, 等, 2010.中国页岩气形成机理、地质特征及资源潜力.石油勘探与开发, 37(6):641-653. http://d.old.wanfangdata.com.cn/Periodical/syktykf201006001
    • 加载中
    图(12) / 表(6)
    计量
    • 文章访问数:  4616
    • HTML全文浏览量:  2492
    • PDF下载量:  51
    • 被引次数: 0
    出版历程
    • 收稿日期:  2018-10-12
    • 刊出日期:  2019-03-15

    目录

      /

      返回文章
      返回