福建平和矾山地区花岗岩地球化学、年代学、Hf同位素特征及地质意义

王森; 张达; 赵红松; 潘天望; 吕良冀; 冯海滨; 狄永军

doi:10.3799/dqkx.2016.005

福建平和矾山地区花岗岩地球化学、年代学、Hf同位素特征及地质意义

doi: 10.3799/dqkx.2016.005

中国地质大学地质过程与矿产资源国家重点实验室，北京 100083

基金项目:

“武夷山植被覆盖区成矿地质背景研究与成矿要素综合推断”项目 1212011085472

中国地质调查局“武夷山植被覆盖区勘查模型研究与控矿要素探查”项目 12120113089600

福建龙岩马坑-大田汤泉铁矿整装勘查区专项填图与技术应用示范”项目 12120114028701

详细信息

作者简介:
王森(1986-)，男，博士，主要从事构造地质学及成矿地质背景研究.E-mail: wangsen_cug@163.com

通讯作者:
张达, E-mail: zhangda@cugb.edu.cn

中图分类号: P597; P595
计量
- 文章访问数: 5481
- HTML全文浏览量: 2206
- PDF下载量: 32
- 被引次数: 0
出版历程
- 收稿日期: 2015-09-30
- 刊出日期: 2016-01-15

Geochemistry, Zircon U-Pb Dating and Hf Isotope Composition of Granite in Fanshan Area, Pinghe County, Fujian Province, and Its Geological Significance

State Key Laboratory of Geological Processes and Mineral Resources, China University of Geosciences, Beijing 100083, China

摘要

摘要: 为了揭示矾山地区中生代花岗岩的成因、侵位时间及其与成矿的关系，在岩石地球化学研究基础上，进行锆石U-Pb-Hf同位素测试，并与紫金山矿田进行对比，为本区找矿预测提供依据.矾山地区花岗岩具有高钾、高碱、富硅、低钛等特征，富集轻稀土元素，具弱-中等负铕异常.富集大离子亲石元素(K、Rb、Th等)，亏损高场强元素(Nb、Ta、Ti等)，具有板块俯冲后伸展环境特征.对花岗岩岩体进行锆石U-Pb测年，获得了110 Ma的年龄.花岗岩与花岗闪长岩Hf同位素特征相似，ε_Hf(t)为-3.1~1.6，T_DM2为1 066~1 366 Ma，说明花岗岩主要来源于中元古代地壳物质的重融，同时显示出壳幔混合作用的特征.矾山地区与紫金山矿区构造、成岩、成矿特征相似，具有“紫金山式”铜金矿找矿潜力.
- 大小矾山 /
- 锆石U-Pb /
- Hf同位素 /
- 紫金山 /
- 岩石学
Abstract: In order to study the chronological and geochemical characteristics of the Mesozoic granite and granodiorite from Fanshan area and their relationship with the regional mineralization, the LA-MC-ICPMS zircons U-Pb dating method was employed to assess the ages and Hf isotope composition, preceded by their petrological and geochemical studies. In addition, the authors aim to provide more evidences that will facilitate the next phase of prospecting by making a comparison with Zijinshan copper-gold ore field. The metaluminous-peraluminous high-K calcalkaline granite series and granodiorite are characterized by high contents of K₂O, SiO₂, and low TiO₂. These samples are enriched in light rare earth element (LREE) and large ionic lithophile elements (LILE, e.g. K, Rb, Sr, Cs), but depleted in high strength elements (HFSE, e.g. Nb, Ta, Zr, Ti), and have negative Eu anomalies. The geochemical properties of granite and granodiorite are similar to those of the magmatic arc rocks, which suggest a backarc spreading setting. The zircon U-Pb dating of two representative samples yield an emplaced age of 110 Ma, in Early Cretaceous. Zircon grains from the granites have lower Hf-isotpe compositions with ε_Hf(t)=-3.1-1.6 and younger Hf model ages (T_DM2)=1 066-1 366 Ma. In comparison with the metamorphic basement near the study area, we suggest that the granitic rocks are probably derived from a Mesoproterozoic crust, but the granodiorite may have originated from a Mesoproterozoic crust-mixed with a fraction of mantle materials. Based on the comparative study with Zijinishan Orefield, it is concluded that there are similar structural, lithogeneous and metallogenic features between the two areas, and there is huge prospecting potential to find "Zijinshan style" copper-gold polymetallic deposits in Fanshan area.
- Fanshan /
- zircon U-Pb dating /
- Hf isotope /
- Zijinshan /
- petrology

HTML全文

图 1 矾山地区地质简图(a)及区域位置图(b)

1.第四纪；2.下白垩统黄坑组；3.上侏罗统南园组上段；4.上侏罗统南园组中段；5.上侏罗统南园组下段；6.下侏罗统梨山组；7.花岗岩；8.花岗闪长岩；9.二长花岗岩；10.地质界线；11.断层；12.采样点；a.据福建省地质调查研究院，2011.福建平和大小矾山地区矿产远景调查地质矿产图；b.据韦德光等(1997)

Fig. 1. Geological sketch map (a) and regional location (b) of the Fanshan area

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

图 2 矾山地区花岗岩(a)和花岗闪长岩(b)显微镜下特征

Qtz.石英；Pl.斜长石；Kf.钾长石；Bt.黑云母；Hb.普通角闪石

Fig. 2. Microscope images of granites (a) and granodiorites (b) from the Fanshan area

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

图 3 样品X01-b2(a)和F02-b1(b)锆石阴极发光图像及测试点位置

Fig. 3. Cathodoluminescence images and the test location of zircons from samples of X01-b2 (a) and F02-b1 (b)

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

图 4 样品X01-b2(a，b)和F02-b1(c，d)锆石U-Pb年龄谐和图

Fig. 4. Zircon U-Pb concordia diagram of samples of X01-b2(a, b) and F02-b1(c, d)

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

图 5 矾山地区花岗岩与花岗闪长岩的SiO₂-(Na₂O+K₂O)及SiO₂-K₂O图

a据Le Bas et al.(1986)及SiO₂-K₂O图解；b据Peccerillo and Taylor(1976)

Fig. 5. The SiO₂-(Na₂O+K₂O) (a) and SiO₂-K₂O (b) diagrams of granite and granodiorite from the Fanshan area

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

图 6 矾山地区花岗岩(a)及花岗闪长岩(b)稀土元素球粒陨石标准化配分模式

标准值据Sun and McDonough(1989)

Fig. 6. Chondrite-normalized REE patterns of granite (a) and granodiorite (b) from the Fanshan area

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

图 7 矾山地区花岗岩(a)及花岗闪长岩(b)微量元素原始地幔标准化蜘蛛图

标准值据Sun and McDonough(1989)

Fig. 7. Primitive mantle normalized spider diagram of granite (a) and granodiorite (b) from the Fanshan area

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

图 8 矾山地区花岗岩及花岗闪长岩ε_Hf(t)-T关系

Fig. 8. ε_Hf(t)-T diagram of granites and granodiorites from the Fanshan area

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

图 9 矾山地区花岗岩及花岗闪长岩Y-Nb及(Rb/30)-Hf-Ta×3判别图解

a据Foster et al.(1997)；b据Harris et al.(1986)

Fig. 9. Y-Nb and (Rb/30)-Hf-Ta×3 discrimination diagrams of the granite and granodiorite from the Fanshan area

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

表 1 矾山地区花岗岩及花岗闪长岩LA-MC-ICP MS锆石U-Pb定年测试结果

Table 1. LA-MC-ICP MS Zircon U-Pb dating results of granite and granodiorite from the Fanshan area

测试点	Th/U	同位素比值			年龄(Ma)
测试点	Th/U	²⁰⁷Pb/²⁰⁶Pb±1σ	²⁰⁷Pb/²³⁵U±1σ	²⁰⁶Pb/²³⁸U±1σ	²⁰⁷Pb/²⁰⁶Pb±1σ	²⁰⁷Pb/²³⁵U±1σ	²⁰⁶Pb/²³⁸U±1σ
X01-b2
1	0.625 1	0.049 1±0.005 8	0.118 0±0.013 3	0.017 4±0.000 2	151±276	113±13	111±1
2	0.594 7	0.049 1±0.001 8	0.118 4±0.004 3	0.017 5±0.000 1	154±84	114±4	112±1
3	0.915 4	0.059 7±0.001 8	0.142 1±0.004 2	0.017 3±0.000 1	591±64	135±4	110±1
4	0.645 2	0.054 6±0.001 1	0.152 6±0.003 3	0.020 3±0.000 1	396±43	144±3	129±1
5	0.816 2	0.090 5±0.001 3	0.212 9±0.003 6	0.017 1±0.000 1	1436±28	196±3	109±1
6	0.678 8	0.055 3±0.000 9	0.132 5±0.002 2	0.017 4±0.000 1	424±36	126±2	111±1
7	0.489 3	0.049 4±0.001 7	0.120 7±0.004 2	0.017 7±0.000 1	165±80	116±4	113±1
8	0.713 8	0.083 9±0.002 1	0.197 8±0.005 1	0.017 1±0.000 1	1 289±49	183±5	109±1
9	0.849 2	0.212 6±0.001 5	0.502 8±0.007 4	0.017 2±0.000 2	2 925±11	414±6	110±1
10	0.982 0	0.050 7±0.000 8	0.125 6±0.002 0	0.018 0±0.000 1	228±35	120±2	115±1
11	0.832 3	0.048 4±0.001 1	0.118 7±0.002 7	0.017 8±0.000 1	117±52	114±3	114±1
12	0.761 6	0.048 9±0.003 2	0.120 5±0.008 2	0.017 9±0.000 1	143±156	116±8	114±1
13	0.529 6	0.055 2±0.001 3	0.153 5±0.003 7	0.020 2±0.000 1	419±54	145±3	129±1
14	0.506 2	0.048 5±0.001 2	0.119 3±0.003 2	0.017 9±0.000 1	122±60	114±3	114±1
15	0.494 8	0.087 0±0.001 6	0.204 0±0.003 9	0.017 0±0.000 1	1 361±36	189±4	109±1
16	0.489 8	0.051 3±0.003 0	0.127 8±0.007 5	0.018 1±0.000 1	254±133	122±7	115±1
17	0.945 9	0.051 9±0.001 9	0.123 0±0.005 5	0.017 2±0.000 1	283±82	118±5	110±1
8	0.484 2	0.052 1±0.000 4	0.122 6±0.001 0	0.017 1±0.000 1	290±18	117±1	109±1
19	0.550 2	0.049 0±0.002 6	0.118 5±0.006 4	0.017 6±0.000 1	146±126	114±6	112±1
20	0.722 5	0.277 3±0.002 0	0.661 1±0.004 0	0.017 3±0.000 1	-	515±3	111±1
21	0.730 2	0.049 2±0.000 7	0.120 4±0.001 7	0.017 8±0.000 1	156±31	115±2	113±1
F02-b1
1	0.455 0	0.047 1±0.002 9	0.112 3±0.006 8	0.017 3±0.000 1	54±145	108±7	111±1
2	0.240 7	0.047 4±0.002 0	0.115 7±0.005 0	0.017 7±0.000 1	69±101	111±5	113±1
3	0.895 9	0.050 4±0.002 0	0.119 0±0.004 7	0.017 1±0.000 1	213±90	114±4	109±1
4	0.375 7	0.048 4±0.001 6	0.116 5±0.004 1	0.017 5±0.000 1	120±80	112±4	112±1
5	0.578 6	0.089 0±0.002 0	0.184 1±0.004 3	0.015 0±0.000 1	1 405±44	172±4	96±1
6	0.402 9	0.048 8±0.002 6	0.114 9±0.006 1	0.017 1±0.000 1	139±126	110±6	109±1
7	0.544 5	0.047 5±0.001 1	0.113 9±0.002 6	0.017 4±0.000 1	75±54	110±3	111±1
8	0.641 5	0.048 5±0.003 1	0.114 9±0.007 5	0.017 2±0.000 1	125±151	110±7	110±1
9	0.480 8	0.047 8±0.001 4	0.113 5±0.003 3	0.017 2±0.000 1	91±68	109±3	110±1
10	0.772 7	0.049 0±0.002 0	0.115 5±0.004 8	0.017 1±0.000 1	149±97	111±5	109±1
11	0.507 2	0.048 5±0.002 3	0.114 9±0.017 2	0.017 2±0.000 5	122±110	110±17	110±3
12	0.637 1	0.086 2±0.002 2	0.194 7±0.005 8	0.016 4±0.000 1	1 342±50	181±5	105±1
13	0.412 6	0.050 1±0.002 1	0.118 1±0.005 2	0.017 1±0.000 1	198±98	113±5	109±1
14	0.597 4	0.068 1±0.001 4	0.152 5±0.003 5	0.016 2±0.000 1	872±43	144±3	104±1
15	0.538 0	0.049 2±0.001 6	0.113 6±0.003 9	0.016 7±0.000 1	159±76	109±4	107±1
16	0.316 9	0.071 2±0.001 5	0.160 2±0.003 8	0.016 3±0.000 1	964±43	151±4	104±1
17	0.487 8	0.053 4±0.001 4	0.120 4±0.003 4	0.016 3±0.000 1	346±60	115±3	105±1
18	0.618 8	0.050 6±0.001 5	0.118 2±0.003 7	0.017 0±0.000 1	221±69	113±4	108±1
19	0.062 8	0.049 4±0.003 8	0.117 6±0.009 4	0.017 3±0.000 1	166±181	113±9	110±1
20	0.611 8	0.048 9±0.002 1	0.116 5±0.005 0	0.017 3±0.000 1	145±100	112±5	110±1
21	2.517 5	0.372 3±0.006 6	0.889 3±0.019 7	0.017 3±0.000 1	3 801±27	646±14	111±1
22	0.973 2	0.046 9±0.000 7	0.113 5±0.001 8	0.017 6±0.000 1	44±38	109±2	112±1
23	0.675 4	0.048 6±0.002 9	0.111 5±0.007 0	0.016 7±0.000 1	128±140	107±7	106±1
24	0.551 4	0.048 4±0.001 9	0.115 2±0.004 5	0.017 3±0.000 1	117±91	111±4	110±1
25	0.761 3	0.080 5±0.001 8	0.217 0±0.005 1	0.019 6±0.000 1	1 208±44	199±5	125±1
26	0.704 6	0.077 2±0.002 0	0.182 5±0.005 4	0.017 2±0.000 1	1 125±53	170±5	110±1
27	0.477 4	0.048 5±0.001 8	0.112 7±0.004 3	0.016 9±0.000 1	123±89	108±4	108±1

下载: 导出CSV

表 2 矾山地区花岗岩及花岗闪长岩LA-MC-ICP MS锆石Lu-Hf同位素分析结果

Table 2. LA-ICP MS zircon Lu-Hf isopote analyses for granite and granodiorite from the Fanshan area

样品	年龄(Ma)	¹⁷⁶Yb/¹⁷⁷Hf	¹⁷⁶Lu/¹⁷⁷Hf	¹⁷⁶Hf/¹⁷⁷Hf	2σ	ε_Hf(0)	ε_Hf(t)	T_DM1(Ma)	T_DM2(Ma)	f_Lu/Hf
X01-b2
1	111	0.027 015	0.001 061	0.282 643	0.000 010	-4.6	-2.2	864	1 306	-0.97
2	112	0.037 299	0.001 560	0.282 662	0.000 010	-3.9	-1.5	847	1 265	-0.95
3	110	0.039 347	0.001 595	0.282 595	0.000 012	-6.2	-3.9	944	1 416	-0.95
5	109	0.023 133	0.000 975	0.282 579	0.000 014	-6.8	-4.5	951	1 450	-0.97
6	111	0.040 227	0.001 624	0.282 519	0.000 014	-8.9	-6.6	1 054	1 586	-0.95
8	109	0.032 508	0.001 402	0.282 679	0.000 009	-3.3	-1.0	820	1 228	-0.96
9	110	0.063 931	0.002 630	0.282 537	0.000 011	-8.3	-6.1	1056	1 551	-0.92
18	109	0.038 288	0.001 569	0.282 692	0.000 010	-2.8	-0.5	805	1 200	-0.95
19	112	0.028 630	0.001 117	0.282 683	0.000 010	-3.1	-0.8	808	1 216	-0.97
20	111	0.030 854	0.001 131	0.282 701	0.000 011	-2.5	-0.2	783	1 177	-0.97
21	113	0.050 733	0.001 987	0.282 681	0.000 011	-3.2	-0.9	830	1 224	-0.94
FS02-b1
2	111	0.013 678	0.000 535	0.282 682	0.000 010	-3.2	-0.8	797	1 216	-0.98
3	113	0.037 866	0.001 593	0.282 751	0.000 012	-0.7	1.6	722	1 066	-0.95
4	109	0.039 804	0.001 554	0.282 678	0.000 009	-3.3	-1.0	825	1 232	-0.95
7	109	0.017 343	0.000 777	0.282 624	0.000 009	-5.2	-2.9	884	1 350	-0.98
8	111	0.030 083	0.001 207	0.282 721	0.000 013	-1.8	0.5	757	1 133	-0.96
9	110	0.017 760	0.000 748	0.282 687	0.000 012	-3.0	-0.6	795	1 207	-0.98
10	110	0.029 363	0.001 315	0.282 673	0.000 014	-3.5	-1.2	826	1 241	-0.96
11	109	0.034 150	0.001 321	0.282 705	0.000 012	-2.4	-0.1	782	1 171	-0.96
12	110	0.025 608	0.001 050	0.282 658	0.000 009	-4.0	-1.7	842	1 274	-0.97
14	109	0.032 049	0.001 304	0.282 663	0.000 011	-3.9	-1.5	841	1 264	-0.96
16	107	0.020 797	0.000 899	0.282 624	0.000 009	-5.2	-2.9	886	1 351	-0.97
18	105	0.023 738	0.001 059	0.282 645	0.000 010	-4.5	-2.3	860	1 305	-0.97
19	108	0.014 048	0.000 628	0.282 658	0.000 012	-4.0	-1.7	833	1 274	-0.98
20	110	0.024 369	0.001 071	0.282 708	0.000 012	-2.3	0.1	772	1 161	-0.97
21	110	0.021 229	0.000 950	0.282 664	0.000 013	-3.8	-1.5	832	1 260	-0.97
23	112	0.040 189	0.001 738	0.282 617	0.000 013	-5.5	-3.1	916	1 366	-0.95
24	106	0.035 257	0.001 510	0.282 640	0.000 014	-4.7	-2.5	879	1 319	-0.95
25	110	0.022 432	0.000 938	0.282 695	0.000 011	-2.7	-0.4	788	1 191	-0.97
27	108	0.025 462	0.001 128	0.282 666	0.000 010	-3.8	-1.5	833	1 258	-0.97

下载: 导出CSV

表 3 矾山地区花岗岩及花岗闪长岩主量元素分析结果(%)

Table 3. Major element analytical results of granite and granodiorite from the Fanshan area

样品号	X01-b1	X01-b2	X02-b1	X03-b1	X04-b1	X05-b1	X05-b2	X05-b3	F01-b1	F02-b1	F03-b1	F04-b1	F05-b1	F06-b1	F07-b1
SiO₂	77.60	76.50	75.48	74.62	69.21	77.37	77.77	77.57	64.78	69.88	67.02	64.34	64.26	64.61	62.98
TiO₂	0.14	0.14	0.24	0.22	0.43	0.14	0.14	0.15	0.63	0.41	0.53	0.66	0.68	0.68	0.71
Al₂O₃	12.33	12.18	12.74	13.44	14.83	12.60	12.38	12.46	16.47	14.31	15.19	15.25	16.15	15.20	15.78
Fe₂O₃	0.33	0.67	1.32	0.90	1.97	0.87	0.77	0.80	3.22	2.05	1.90	2.78	3.17	2.89	2.81
FeO	0.43	0.11	0.52	0.77	1.37	0.18	0.13	0.11	1.81	1.27	1.86	2.52	2.31	2.53	3.06
MnO	0.03	0.03	0.08	0.07	0.12	0.05	0.02	0.04	0.13	0.06	0.06	0.10	0.08	0.10	0.12
MgO	0.11	0.11	0.41	0.41	1.15	0.11	0.12	0.12	1.75	1.07	1.62	1.99	2.03	2.10	2.31
CaO	0.40	0.42	1.23	1.34	2.85	0.27	0.28	0.36	3.32	2.85	3.19	4.28	3.59	4.29	4.44
Na₂O	3.19	3.03	3.41	3.70	3.55	3.24	3.02	2.97	2.57	3.06	3.84	3.18	2.92	2.95	3.05
K₂O	5.03	5.06	4.09	4.18	3.75	5.09	4.90	5.20	2.97	3.94	3.11	3.10	2.87	3.06	2.84
P₂O₅	0.02	0.02	0.06	0.06	0.14	0.02	0.01	0.01	0.21	0.12	0.17	0.21	0.22	0.21	0.23
LOI	0.65	0.72	0.69	0.68	1.29	0.70	0.77	0.74	1.90	0.81	1.30	1.36	1.56	1.14	1.43
Total	100.26	98.99	100.27	100.39	100.66	100.64	100.31	100.53	99.77	99.81	99.78	99.78	99.82	99.77	99.75
ALK	8.25	8.29	7.53	7.90	7.35	8.34	7.96	8.19	5.54	6.99	6.95	6.29	5.78	6.02	5.89
A.R	3.01	2.85	2.91	3.01	2.34	3.03	2.82	2.73	1.78	2.11	2.44	1.97	1.84	1.87	1.86

下载: 导出CSV

表 4 矾山地区花岗岩及花岗闪长岩稀土、微量元素分析结果(10^-6)

Table 4. REE and trace element analytical results of granite and granodiorite from the Fanshan area

样品号	X01-b1	X01-b2	X02-b1	X03-b1	X04-b1	X05-b1	X05-b2	X05-b3	F01-b1	F02-b1	F03-b1	F04-b1	F05-b1	F06-b1	F07-b1
La	46.18	63.68	41.65	43.06	28.70	40.29	56.94	44.96	41.39	48.56	31.56	33.70	33.34	29.99	31.39
Ce	78.37	75.52	73.37	77.41	54.81	67.23	56.19	38.91	73.68	68.76	63.45	65.99	63.66	61.89	63.66
Pr	9.61	14.28	8.32	8.72	6.12	8.10	11.66	10.07	9.83	10.52	7.24	7.82	8.55	7.60	7.72
Nd	32.42	47.15	28.81	31.31	22.78	28.07	40.80	34.48	37.37	38.01	25.84	28.99	32.12	28.92	29.04
Sm	5.55	8.33	5.22	6.03	4.43	5.06	7.12	5.96	6.94	7.12	4.75	5.52	6.26	5.58	5.52
Eu	0.66	0.96	0.77	0.91	1.11	0.61	0.79	0.69	1.70	1.60	1.13	1.32	1.40	1.29	1.29
Gd	4.60	6.44	4.93	6.59	4.05	4.65	5.93	4.60	6.55	7.07	4.20	5.28	6.01	4.98	4.93
Tb	0.79	1.14	0.93	1.38	0.72	0.81	1.01	0.79	0.99	1.14	0.68	0.84	0.92	0.77	0.77
Dy	4.40	5.95	5.63	9.14	4.06	4.59	5.34	4.15	6.03	7.20	4.14	5.28	5.75	4.63	4.70
Ho	0.88	1.08	1.18	2.05	0.82	0.91	1.01	0.77	1.16	1.42	0.79	1.03	1.09	0.88	0.90
Er	2.71	3.22	3.81	6.72	2.60	2.78	3.04	2.39	3.42	4.44	2.41	3.02	3.19	2.51	2.60
Tm	0.47	0.53	0.68	1.20	0.44	0.47	0.50	0.40	0.58	0.78	0.42	0.51	0.55	0.42	0.44
Yb	3.28	3.63	4.87	8.28	3.13	3.26	3.46	2.83	3.71	5.23	2.86	3.28	3.43	2.69	2.85
Lu	0.45	0.47	0.60	0.94	0.40	0.46	0.50	0.41	0.61	0.92	0.49	0.56	0.55	0.43	0.45
∑REE	190.37	232.38	180.77	203.74	134.17	167.29	194.29	151.41	193.96	202.76	149.95	163.14	166.81	152.58	156.24
L/H	9.83	9.35	6.99	4.61	7.27	8.33	8.35	8.27	7.42	6.19	8.38	7.24	6.76	7.81	7.86
(La/Yb)_N	10.10	12.58	6.13	3.73	6.58	8.87	11.80	1.21	8.90	8.75	8.27	8.54	9.14	9.46	9.53
(La/Sm)_N	5.37	4.94	5.15	4.61	4.18	5.14	5.16	1.88	4.93	4.87	4.86	4.83	4.86	4.94	4.91
(Gd/Yb)_N	1.16	1.47	0.84	0.66	1.07	1.18	1.42	0.56	1.14	1.14	1.10	1.13	1.19	1.21	1.21
δEu	0.40	0.40	0.46	0.44	0.80	0.38	0.37	0.27	0.77	0.69	0.77	0.75	0.70	0.75	0.76
Cs	2.33	2.09	2.46	2.36	2.95	2.86	3.08	3.20	3.49	5.31	2.26	3.09	3.42	1.72	1.82
Rb	194.10	193.30	199.80	191.00	152.30	179.20	214.00	191.80	59.90	129.20	78.10	76.30	52.20	68.10	67.50
Ba	437.70	443.20	578.20	649.70	711.10	508.50	662.60	589.40	701.10	605.40	674.90	642.10	698.90	766.30	682.70
Th	20.30	22.52	25.30	21.74	14.81	21.29	25.13	23.21	17.72	25.14	21.21	17.50	15.16	13.64	14.31
U	3.47	3.49	3.65	3.47	4.06	4.07	7.05	3.94	5.30	7.39	5.25	7.14	4.38	3.57	4.21
Nb	6.50	9.49	8.69	6.49	3.67	6.39	7.06	6.28	9.10	11.40	10.90	8.70	8.90	9.50	9.10
Ta	1.33	1.57	2.00	1.76	1.31	1.39	1.57	1.46	1.55	1.77	1.82	1.58	1.41	1.12	1.18
Pb	18.89	16.10	23.67	24.21	27.01	19.86	25.03	17.37	11.44	16.05	28.32	17.43	28.18	13.15	19.03
Sr	58.40	62.02	162.90	166.20	365.00	83.64	83.56	82.09	245.10	270.00	269.20	277.10	257.00	308.00	384.10
Zr	92.00	86.45	117.19	118.91	136.30	87.16	86.54	94.31	82.30	101.80	89.70	91.80	87.30	107.10	128.00
Hf	3.96	3.84	5.25	5.48	6.27	4.07	4.36	4.49	3.05	3.80	3.35	4.04	3.49	3.43	5.99
Y	4.40	5.95	5.63	9.14	4.06	4.59	5.34	4.15	35.87	46.37	23.41	30.80	32.52	25.31	25.30
Zr/Hf	23.23	22.49	22.34	21.70	21.74	21.42	19.87	21.01	26.97	26.77	26.78	22.70	25.02	31.19	21.35
Nb/Ta	4.88	6.06	4.35	3.68	2.81	4.58	4.48	4.31	5.86	6.44	5.99	5.51	6.29	8.47	7.72
Ba/Nb	67.30	46.72	66.55	100.08	193.90	79.58	93.92	93.91	77.04	53.11	61.92	73.80	78.53	80.66	75.02
Nb/U	1.87	2.71	2.38	1.87	0.90	1.57	1.00	1.59	1.72	1.54	2.08	1.22	2.03	2.66	2.16
Ba/La	9.48	6.96	13.88	15.09	24.78	12.62	11.64	13.11	16.94	12.47	21.38	19.05	20.96	25.55	21.75
Ce/Pb	4.15	4.69	3.10	3.20	2.03	3.38	2.24	2.24	6.44	4.28	2.24	3.79	2.26	4.71	3.35
Zr/Ba	0.21	0.20	0.20	0.18	0.19	0.17	0.13	0.16	0.12	0.17	0.13	0.14	0.12	0.14	0.19

下载: 导出CSV

参考文献(79)

Chen, B., 2010.On the Geologic Characteristics of the Xiaoqinshan Iron and Gold Metallic Ores in Pinghe County, Fujian Province and Its Ore-Finding Prospect.Geology of Fujian, 29(3):207-211(in Chinese with English abstract). http://en.cnki.com.cn/Article_en/CJFDTotal-FJDZ201003006.htm
Chen, J.H., 1999.The Metallogenic Mode of Zijinshan Copper(Gold) Deposit.Gold, 20(7):8-13(in Chinese with English abstract). http://en.cnki.com.cn/Article_en/CJFDTOTAL-HJZZ907.001.htm
Chen, J.Y., Yang, J.H., Zhang, J.H., et al., 2014.Geochemical Transition Shown by Cretaceous Granitoids in Southeastern China: Implications for Continental Crustal Reworking and Growth.Lithos, (196-197):115-130.doi: 10.1016/j.lithos.2014.03.003
Foster, H.J., Tischendorf, G., Trumbull, R.B., 1997.An Evaluation of the R (Y+Nb) Discrimination Diagram to Infer Tectonic Setting of Silicic Igneous Rocks.Lithos, 40(2-4):261-293. doi: 10.1016/S0024-4937(97)00032-7
Harris, N.B.W., Pearce, J.A., Tindle, A.G., 1986.Geochemical Characteristics of Collision-Zone Magmatism.In:Coward, M.P., Reis, A.C., eds., Collision Tectonics.Geological Society of London, Special Publications, 19(1):67-81.doi: 10.1144/gsl.sp.1986.019.01.04
Huang, J.T., Hong, Y.P., Yang, L.C., et al., 1990.Geological Characteristics of Minerogenesis and Prospecting of Silver-Lead-Zinc, Tin and Gold in Mesozoic Volcanic Intrusive Complex Region, Pinghe-Anxi Area, Fujian Province.Geology of Fujian, 9(3):215-227(in Chinese with English abstract). http://en.cnki.com.cn/Article_en/CJFDTotal-FJDZ199003005.htm
Huang, W.T., Hu, C.J., Li, J., et al., 2011.Zircon LA-ICP-MS U-Pb Dating and Charateristics of Luoboling Copper-Molybdenum Mineralized Porphyry, in Zijinshan Area.Acta Mineralogica Sinica, 31(Suppl.):592-593(in Chinese).
Huang, W.T., Li, J., Liang, H.Y., et al., 2013.Zircon LA-ICP-MS U-Pb Ages and Highly Oxidized Features of Magma Associated with Luoboling Porphyry Cu-Mo Deposit in Zijinshan Ore Field, Fujian Province.Acta Petrologica Sinica, 29(1):283-293(in Chinese with English abstract). http://www.oalib.com/paper/1473911
Jiang, S.H., Liang, Q.L., Bagas, L., et al., 2013.Geodynamic Setting of the Zijinshan Porphyry-Epithermal Cu-Au-Mo-Ag Ore System, SW Fujian Province, China:Constrains from the Geochronology and Geochemistry of the Igneous Rocks.Ore Geology Reviews, (53):287-305. http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0169136813000255
Johnson, K.E., Harmon, R.S., Richardson, J.M., et al., 1996.Isotope and Trace Element Geochemistry of Augustine Volcano, Alaska:Implications for Magmatic Evolution.Journal of Petrology, 37(1):95-115.doi: 10.1093/petrology/37.1.95
Le Bas, M.J., Maitre, R.W., Strecklsen, A., et al., 1986.A Chemical Classification of Volcanic Rocks Based on the Total Alkli-Slica Diagram.Journal of Petrology, 27(3):745-750. doi: 10.1093/petrology/27.3.745
Li, B., Jiang, S.Y., 2014.Geochronology and Geochemistry of Cretaceous Nanshanping Alkaline Rocks from the Zijinshan District in Fujian Province, South China:Implications for Crust-Mantle Interaction and Lithospheric Extension.Journal of Asian Earth Sciences, 93:253-274.doi: 10.1016/j.jseaes.2014.07.040
Li, X.H., Long, W.G., Li, Q.L., et al., 2010.Penglai Zircon Megacrysts:A Potential New Working Reference Material for Microbeam Determination of Hf-O Isotopes and U-Pb Age.Geostandards and Geoanalytical Research, 34(2):117-134. doi: 10.1111/j.1751-908X.2010.00036.x
Li, X.Y., Guo, F., Wang, Y.J., 2002.Post-Orogenic Tectono-Magmatism and Its Implications for Evolution of Orogenic Belts.Geological Journal of China Universities, 8(1):68-78(in Chinese with English abstract). http://en.cnki.com.cn/Article_en/CJFDTotal-GXDX200201007.htm
Li, Z., Qiu, J.S., Yang, X.M., 2014.A Review of the Geochronology and Geochemistry of Late Yanshanian (Cretaceous) Plutons along the Fujian Coastal Area of Southeastern China:Implications for Magma Evolution Related to Slab Break-Off and Rollback in the Cretaceous.Earth-Science Review, (128):232-248.doi: 10.1016/j.earscirev.2013.09.007
Liang, Q.L., Jiang, S.H., Wang, S.H., et al., 2013.Petrogenesis of the Mesozoic Magmatic Rocks in Zijinshan Area:Constraints from Zircon Hf Isotope Evidence.Acta Petrologica et Mineralogica, 32(3):318-328(in Chinese with English abstract). http://en.cnki.com.cn/Article_en/CJFDTOTAL-YSKW201303005.htm
Lin, D.Y., Zheng, Z.Q., 2011.The Country Rock Alteration Characteristics and Ore-Finding Potential Analysis in the Fanshan of Pinghe County, Fujian Province.Geology of Fujian, 30(1):1-5(in Chinese with English abstract). http://en.cnki.com.cn/Article_en/CJFDTOTAL-FJDZ201101002.htm
Mao, J.R., 2013.Mesozoic-Cenozoic Magmatism and Mineralization in Southeastern China and the Surrounding Areas.Science Press, Beijing (in Chinese).
Mao, J.R., Tao, K.Y., Chen, S.Y., et al., 1998.The Granitic Magmatism and Mineralization in Southwest Fujian.Volcanology and Mineral Resources, 19(4):311-320(in Chinese with English abstract). http://en.cnki.com.cn/Article_en/CJFDTOTAL-HSDZ199804007.htm
Mao, J.R., Tao, K.Y., Li, J.Y., et al., 2002.Geochronology and Geochemical Characteristics in Late Mesozoic Sifang Pluton, Southwestern Fujian, and Their Significance.Acta Petrologica Sinica, 18(4):449-458(in Chinese with English abstract). http://www.en.cnki.com.cn/Article_en/CJFDTotal-YSXB200204001.htm
Peccerillo, R., Taylor, S.R., 1976.Geochemistry of Eocene Calc-Alkaline Volcanic Rocks from the Kastamonu Area.Northern Turkey, 58(1):63-81. doi: 10.1007/BF00384745
Qiu, J.S., Wang, D.Z., Satoshi, K., et al., 2000.Geochemistry and Petrogenesis of Aluminous A-Type Granites in the Coastal Area of Fujian Province.Geochimica, 29(4):313-321(in Chinese with English abstract). http://en.cnki.com.cn/Article_en/CJFDTOTAL-DQHX200004000.htm
She, R.Q., 2008.Geologic Characteristics of the Tongzhongkeng Anomalous Zone in Pinghe County of Fujian Province and Its Ore-Finding Perspective.Geology of Fujian, 27(3):267-274(in Chinese with English abstract). http://en.cnki.com.cn/Article_en/CJFDTotal-FJDZ200803003.htm
Shu, L.S., 2012.An Analysjs of Principal Features of Tectonic Evolution in South China Block.Geological Bulletin of China, 31(7):1035-1053(in Chinese with English abstract). http://en.cnki.com.cn/Article_en/CJFDTOTAL-ZQYD201207004.htm
Sun, S.S., McDonough, W.F., 1989.Chemical and Isotopic Systematics of Oceanic Basalts:Implications for Mantle Composition and Processes.Geological Society, London, Special Publications, 42(1):313-345.doi: 10.1144/gsl.sp.1989.042.01.19
Tang, L.M., Chen, H.L., Dong, C.W., et al., 2010.Late Mesozoic Tectonic Extension in SE China:Evidence from the Basic Dike Swarms in Hainan Island, China.Acta Petrologica, 26(4):1204-1216(in Chinese with English abstract). http://en.cnki.com.cn/Article_en/CJFDTOTAL-YSXB201004019.htm
Wang, S., 2014.Volcanic Characteristics and Their Prospecting Significance of Fanshan in Pinghe, Fujian Province(Dissertation).China University of Geosciences, Beijing, 21-29(in Chinese with English abstract).
Wang, S., Zhang, D., 2015.The Extensional Tectonic Evolution of the Southwestern Fujian since the Late Neopaleozoic:Constraints from U-Pb Dating and Geochemistry of the Basic-Intermediate Dikes.Geotectonica et Metallogenia, 39(5):889-902 (in Chinese with English abstract).
Wang, S., Zhang, D., Di, Y.J., et al., 2013.Ore-Finding Potential Analysis in the Fanshan of Pinghe County, Fujian Province.Acta Mineralogica Sinica, (Suppl.):50-51(in Chinese).
Wang, X.Q., Xie, X.J., Zhang, B.R., et al., 2010.China Geochemical Probe:Making "Geochemical Earth".Acta Geologica Sinica, 84(6):854-864(in Chinese with English abstract). http://en.cnki.com.cn/Article_en/CJFDTOTAL-DZXE201006011.htm
Wei, C.S., Zheng, Y.F., Zhao, Z.F., 2001.Nd-Sr-O Isotopic Geochemistry Constraints on the Age and Origin of the A-Type Granites in Eastern China.Acta Petrologica Sinica, 17(1):95-111(in Chinese with English abstract). http://en.cnki.com.cn/Article_en/CJFDTOTAL-YSXB200101009.htm
Wei, D.G., Jie, Y.J., Huang, T.G., 1997.Regional Geological Structure of Fujian.Regional Geology of China, 16(2):51-59(in Chinese with English abstract). http://en.cnki.com.cn/Article_en/CJFDTOTAL-ZQYD702.006.htm
Wu, F.Y., Jahn, B.M., Wilde, S.A., et al., 2003a.Highly Fractionated Ⅰ-Type Granites in NE China (Ⅰ):Geochronology and Petrogenesis.Lithos, (66):241-273.doi: 10.1016/s0024-4937(02)00222-0
Wu, F.Y., Jahn, B.M., Wilde, S.A., et al., 2003b.Highly Fractionated Ⅰ-Type Granites in NE China (Ⅱ):Isotopic Geochemistry and Implications for Crustal Growth in the Phanerozoic.Lithos, (67):191-204. http://cpfd.cnki.com.cn/Article/CPFDTOTAL-DZDQ200312004030.htm
Wu, F.Y., Ge, W.C., Sun, D.Y., et al., 2003.Discussions on the Lithosperic Thinning in Eastern China.Earth Science Frontiers, 10(3):51-60(in Chinese with English abstract). http://en.cnki.com.cn/Article_en/CJFDTOTAL-DXQY200303005.htm
Wu, F.Y., Yang, Y.H., Xie, L.W., et al., 2006.Hf Isotopic Compositions of the Standard Zircons and Baddeleyites Used in U-Pb Geochronology.Chemical Geology, 234(1-2):105-126.doi: 10.1016/j.chemgeo.2006.05.003
Wu, G.G., Zhang, D., Chen, B.L., et al., 2000.Transformation of Mesozoic Tectonic Domain and Its Relation to Mineralization in Southeastern China:An Evidence of Southwestern Fujian Province.Earth Science, 25(4):390-396(in Chinese with English abstract). http://en.cnki.com.cn/Article_en/CJFDTOTAL-DQKX200004011.htm
Wu, Y.B., Zheng, Y.F., 2004.Mineralogy Study of the Causes of Zircons and U-Pb Age Constraints on Interpretation.Chinese Science Bulletin, 49(16):1589-1604(in Chinese with English abstract).
Xiao, A.F., Li, D.P., 2012.LAVICP-MS U-Pb Dating of Zircon from Zijinshan Complex Massif, Fujian Province.Journal of East China Institute of Technology (Natural Science), 35(4):343-351(in Chinese with English abstract). http://en.cnki.com.cn/Article_en/CJFDTOTAL-HDDZ201204009.htm
Xu, X.B., Li, Y., Xue, D.J., et al., 2014.Deformation Characteristics and Geochronological Constraints of Late Mesozoic Extensional Structures in Quanzhou, Fujian Province.Earth Science, 39(1):45-63(in Chinese with English abstract). http://www.en.cnki.com.cn/Article_en/CJFDTotal-DQKX201401005.htm
Xu, X.S., O'Reilly, S.Y., Griffin, W.L., et al., 2007.The Crust of Cathaysia:Age, Assembly and Reworking of Two Terranes.Precambrian Research, 158(1-2):51-78.doi: 10.1016/j.precamres.2007.04.010
Ying, J.F., Zhang, H.F., Sun, M., et al., 2007.Petrology and Geochemistry of Zijinshan Alkaline Intrusive Complex in Shanxi Province, Western North China Craton:Implication for Magma Mixing of Different Sources in an Extensional Regime.Lithos, 98(1-4):45-66.doi: 10.1016/j.lithos.2007.02.001
Yu, X.Q., Wu, G.G., Zhang, D., et al., 2006.Cretaceous Extension of the Ganhang Tectonic Belt, Southeastern China:Constraints from Geochemistry of Volcanic Rocks.Cretaceous Research, 27(5):663-672. doi: 10.1016/j.cretres.2006.03.008
Zhang, D., Liu, W.C., Wu, G.G., et al., 2008.Magnetic Fabric and Emplacement of the Fenghuangshan Pluton, Tongling, Anhui Province, East-Central China.International Geology Review, 50(11):994-1007.doi: 10.2747/0020-6814.50.11.994
Zhang, D.Q., She, H.Q., Yan, S.H., et al., 2001.Geochemistry of Mesozoic Magmatites in the Zijinshan Region and Implication on Regional Tectonic Inversion.Geological Rview, 47(6):608-616(in Chinese with English abstract). http://en.cnki.com.cn/article_en/cjfdtotal-dzlp200106012.htm
Zhang, Y.Q., Dong, S.W., Li, J.H., et al., 2012.The New Progress in the Study of Mesozoic Tectonics of South China.Acta Geoscientica Sinica, 33(3):257-279(in Chinese with English abstract). http://en.cnki.com.cn/Article_en/CJFDTOTAL-DQXB201203001.htm
Zhao, X.L., Mao, J.R., Ye, H.M., et al., 2009.The Geochemical Characteristics of Biotite and Its Petrogenesis Implication in the Caixi Pluton and Sifang Pluton from Shanghang Area of Fujian Province.Bulletin of Mineralogy, Petrology and Geochemistry, 28(2):162-168(in Chinese with English abstract). http://en.cnki.com.cn/Article_en/CJFDTotal-KYDH200902010.htm
Zhong, J., Chen, Y.J., Pirajno, F., et al., 2014.Geology, Geochronology, Fluid Inclusion and H-O Isotope Geochemistry of the Luoboling Porphyry Cu-Mo Deposit, Zijinshan Orefield, Fujian Province, China.Ore Geology Reviews, 57:61-77. doi: 10.1016/j.oregeorev.2013.09.004
Zhou, J., Xu, S.F., Chi, Q.H., et al., 2012.Geochemical Characteristics of the Mesozoic Volcanic Belt in Southeast Coast of China.Earth Science Frontiers, 19(3):93-100(in Chinese with English abstract). http://en.cnki.com.cn/Article_en/CJFDTOTAL-DXQY201203011.htm
陈斌, 2010.福建平和小芹山铁金多金属矿地质特征及找矿前景分析.福建地质, 29(3):207-211. http://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-FJDZ201003006.htm
陈景河, 1999.紫金山铜(金)矿床成矿模式.黄金, 20(7):8-13. http://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-HJZZ907.001.htm
黄家厅, 洪尧萍, 杨良彩, 等, 1990.福建平和-安溪中生代火山-侵入杂岩区银铅锌、锡、金成矿地质特征和找矿前景.福建地质, 9(3):215-227. http://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-FJDZ199003005.htm
黄文婷, 胡春杰, 李晶, 等, 2011.福建紫金山矿田罗卜岭铜钼矿化斑岩锆石LA-ICP-MS U-Pb年龄及成矿岩浆特征研究.矿物学报, 31(增刊):592-593. http://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-YSXB201301023.htm
黄文婷, 李晶, 梁华英, 等, 2013.福建紫金山矿田罗卜岭铜钼矿化斑岩锆石LA-ICP-MS U-Pb年龄及成矿岩浆高氧化特征研究.岩石学报, 29(1):283-293. http://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-YSXB201301023.htm
李晓勇, 郭锋, 王岳军, 2002.造山后构造岩浆作用研究评述.高校地质学报, 8(1):68-78. http://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-GXDX200201007.htm
梁清玲, 江思宏, 王少怀, 等, 2013.福建紫金山地区中生代岩浆岩成因——锆石Hf同位素证据.岩石矿物学杂志, 32(3):318-328. http://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-YSKW201303005.htm
林东燕, 郑志强, 2011.福建平和矾山地区围岩蚀变特征与找矿潜力分析.福建地质, 30(1):1-5. http://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-FJDZ201101002.htm
毛建仁, 2013.中国东南部及临区中新生代岩浆作用与成矿.北京:科学出版社.
毛建仁, 陶奎元, 陈三元, 等, 1998.闽西南花岗质岩浆作用与成矿.火山地质与矿产, 19(4):311-320. http://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-HSDZ199804007.htm
毛建仁, 陶奎元, 李寄嵎, 等, 2002.闽西南晚中生代四方岩体同位素年代学、地球化学及其构造意义.岩石学报, 18(4):449-458. http://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-YSXB200204001.htm
邱检生, 王德滋, 蟹泽聪史, 等, 2000.福建沿海铝质A型花岗岩的地球化学及岩石成因.地球化学, 29(4):313-321. http://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-DQHX200004000.htm
佘日启, 2008.福建平和铜钟坑锡异常区地质特征及找矿远景浅析.福建地质, 27(3):267-274. http://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-FJDZ200803003.htm
舒良树, 2012.华南构造演化的基本特征.地质通报, 31(7):1035-1053. http://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-ZQYD201207004.htm
唐立梅, 陈汉林, 董传万, 等, 2010.中国东南部晚中生代构造伸展作用——来自海南岛基性岩墙群的证据.岩石学报, 26(4):1204-1216. http://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-YSXB201004019.htm
王森, 2014. 福建平和大小矾山火山机构特征及找矿意义(硕士学位论文). 北京: 中国地质大学, 21-29. http://cdmd.cnki.com.cn/Article/CDMD-11415-1014238155.htm
王森, 张达, 2015.闽西南晚古生代以来伸展构造演化:中基性岩墙群的年代学、地球化学制约.大地构造与成矿学, 39(5):889-902. http://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-DGYK201505012.htm
王森, 张达, 狄永军, 等, 2013.福建平和大小矾山中生代火山岩覆盖区找矿潜力分析.矿物学报, (增刊):50-51. http://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-KWXB2013S2029.htm
王学求, 谢学锦, 张本仁等, 2010.地壳全元素探测——构建"化学地球".地质学报, 84(6):854-864. http://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-DZXE201006011.htm
魏春生, 郑永飞, 赵子福, 2001.中国东部A型花岗岩形成时代及物质来源的Nd-Sr-O同位素地球化学制约.岩石学报, 17(1):95-111 http://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-YSXB200101009.htm
韦德光, 揭育金, 黄廷淦, 1997.福建省区域地质构造特征.中国区域地质, 16(2):51-59. http://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-ZQYD702.006.htm
吴福元, 葛文春, 孙德有, 等, 2003.中国东部岩石圈减薄研究中的几个问题.地学前缘, 10(3):51-60. http://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-DXQY200303005.htm
吴淦国, 张达, 陈柏林, 等, 2000.中国东南大陆中生代构造域的转换及其与成矿的关系——以闽西南地区为例.地球科学, 25(4):390-396. http://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-DQKX200004011.htm
吴元保, 郑永飞, 2004.锆石成因矿物学研究及其对U-Pb年龄解释的制约.科学通报, 49(16):1589-1604. doi: 10.3321/j.issn:0023-074X.2004.16.002
肖爱芳, 黎敦朋, 2012.福建省紫金山复式花岗岩锆石LA-ICP-MS U-Pb测年.东华理工大学学报(自然科学版), 35(4):343-351. http://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-HDDZ201204009.htm
徐先兵, 李源, 薛德杰, 等, 2014.福建泉州晚中生代伸展构造变形特征与年代学制约.地球科学, 39(1):45-63. http://earth-science.net/WebPage/Article.aspx?id=2828
张德全, 佘宏全, 阎升好等, 2001.福建紫金山地区中生代构造环境转换的岩浆岩地球化学证据.地质论评, 47(6):608-616. http://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-DZLP200106012.htm
张岳桥, 董树文, 李建华, 等, 2012.华南中生代大地构造研究新进展.地球学报, 33(3):257-279. http://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-DQXB201203001.htm
赵希林, 毛建仁, 叶海敏, 等, 2009.福建上杭地区晚中生代花岗质岩体黑云母的地球化学特征及成因意义.矿物岩石地球化学通报, 28(2):162-168. http://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-KYDH200902010.htm
周建, 徐善法, 迟清华, 等, 2012.东南沿海中生代火山岩带地球化学特征.地学前缘, 19(3):93-100. http://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-DXQY201203011.htm